Six channels and per-account billing, built for agencies.

Passive candidates ghost a single channel. You send the email, you send the InMail, and the best people — already employed — never reply. Email and InMail reply rates keep sliding, so the channels most teams lean on get more crowded and less effective. For an agency, per-seat annual pricing compounds it: you pay for every recruiter whether or not they are on a live req.

What decides a switch is rarely who indexes the most candidates — both index more than you can work. It is how many honest ways you have to reach the ones you find, and whether the tool is priced for how an agency actually staffs.

Reply-rate trends reflect widely reported market conditions; verify against your own channel data.

hireEZ is a mature, shipped enterprise platform, and it is strong at what it was built for. Its EZ Agent autonomously sources, ranks, reaches out, phone-screens, and schedules candidates, and it documents an AI inbound phone-screener that MartyHR does not have (hireez.com/platform, as of June 2026). It searches a 1B+ candidate index across 40+ sources, integrates with 50+ ATSes, and rediscovers candidates already in your ATS through Applicant Match.

hireEZ also has what a pre-launch tool cannot: proof — 70+ Fortune-500 customers and a G2 rating around 4.6 across roughly 260 reviews (g2.com, as of June 2026). For an enterprise buyer who needs a shipped agent and a vendor to deploy today, hireEZ is a strong choice, and we will say so.

hireEZ documents outbound on email, SMS, and InMail (hireez.com/automated-campaigns, as of June 2026). MartyHR adds WhatsApp, Telegram, and outbound voice — six channels in one conditional sequence — so when a candidate ghosts on one channel, the cadence reaches them another way. One precision note: hireEZ runs AI inbound phone-screening, so the accurate read is a wider outbound channel set, not that hireEZ has no voice.

Three more reasons agencies and EU teams are joining the list:

• Billed per connected account, not per seat. hireEZ is per-seat on annual contracts; MartyHR bills per connected account, which maps to how an agency staffs many client searches rather than to headcount.
• Your network and HRIS in the same query. hireEZ searches the open web and your ATS; we found no published evidence it searches your team's first-degree network or HRIS. MartyHR adds both.
• A score you can read. MartyHR marks every criterion found, potential, or no evidence and rolls it into a 0–100 fit score you can open. (Pre-launch, designed to spec.)

Choose hireEZ if you are an enterprise buyer who needs a shipped autonomous agent, AI inbound phone-screening, the largest candidate index, broad ATS coverage, and Fortune-500 proof you can deploy now. For that brief, hireEZ is the stronger fit, and we will say so.

Choose MartyHR if you run a recruiting agency or an EU/CEE/DACH in-house TA team, you reach candidates on six channels including WhatsApp, Telegram, and outbound voice, you want your network and HRIS searched alongside the web, and per-connected-account billing fits how you work better than per-seat. Join the launch list and early joiners lock in design-partner pricing and a direct line on the roadmap.